Friday, May 22, 2009

谁是合法、合情、合理的大臣?


11日,高庭裁决尼查为合法大臣。

22日,上诉庭裁决赞比里为合法大臣。

尼查已表明将向联邦法院上诉。

如此上诉来上诉去,永远没完没了。

根据媒体报导,上诉庭三司一致裁决:

(1)高庭法官阿都阿兹之前的裁决错误,

(2)尼查已失去了州议会大多数议员的支持,

(3)苏丹有权拒绝尼查要求解散州议会,

(4)苏丹命令尼查辞职是正确的,

(5)州宪法没有规定必须在州议会向尼查投不信任票,

(6)可从其他途径确认尼查已经失去大多数议员支持,

(7)因此,赞比里是合法的霹雳州务大臣。

而根据媒体在11日的报导,高庭法官阿都阿兹的裁决如下:

(1)州宪法没有明文规定苏丹有权革除尼查的大臣职位,

(2)要革除尼查的大臣职位,苏丹应该召开州议会,以提呈对尼查的不信任动议。

(3)州议会并没有通过不信任动议推翻尼查,

(4)尼查也没有辞职,大臣职位未被悬空,

(5)因此,不能委任新的州务大臣,尼查仍是合法大臣。

6 comments:

朱刚明 said...

t looks like only the people are impartial and the final judges; instead of wasting time going back & forth for court battles, they should simply go back to the people, if they still respect the people at all. Do it the gentleman way.

· 康华 · said...

BN knows for sure that it will definitely lose, that's why it dare not go back to the people.

travii said...

"The ruling means that the Sultan can decide who is mentri besar and also that the Agong can decide who is prime minister. This devolves our system from a constitutional monarchy to an absolute monarchy," - nga k h.

well done malaysia, we will soon have aung san suukyi n nelson mandela...

travii said...

http://www.themalaysianinsider.com/index.php/malaysia/27430-nizar-sivakumar-on-hunger-strike-for-fresh-polls

we will have gandhi as well. shd be happy or sad?

· 康华 · said...

我佩服西华和尼查不屈不挠的毅力和勇气,没有多少人可以做到这样子,虽然知道,到最后可能还是输,but it's the principle。他们是真汉子。

travii said...

http://www.themalaysianinsider.com/index.php/malaysia/27456-police-raid-dap-hq-seize-pc-dvds

now we will bcome burma?

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...